Post by account_disabled on Dec 24, 2023 3:04:59 GMT
Turklt AMP lapu ir maz. Google ir minjis piespiest izdevjus pieemt AMP tau lielk daa no tiem ir pretojusies. Tiek lsts ka AMP ievieanas lmenis ir aptuveni . Daji tas ir tpc ka AMP lapas ir grti izveidot un uzturt un daji tpc ka ts biei vien nodroina sliktku lietoanas pieredzi nek parasts mobils tmeka vietnes. Bija paredzts ka AMP bs liels solis uz prieku mobilaj tmekl. Tau t viet t ir sagdjusi lielu vilanos. Google vajadztu atteikties no projekta un pievrsties svargkm lietm. Was a waste of time and resources Pirmaj viet nekad nav bijis tik efektvs. Google AMP skotnji nekad nav bijis tik efektvs. T tika ieviesta lai tmeka vietnes trk ieldtos mobilajs iercs tau t netika ieviesta t k Google bija cerjis. Tam ir vairki iemesli bet galvenais no tiem ir tas ka lielkajai daai cilvku nav svargs ir par tmeka vietnm. Lielk daa cilvku ir apmierinti ja vien lapa beidzot ieldjas. Daudziem vietu paniekiem Google AMP bija ar grti ieviest tpc t nekad t sti nepieteics. Ar Google reklmdevjiem biei bija oti problemtiski reklamt to jo tkl bija problmas ar keanu. Tas ir tikai veids k Google pelnt naudu.
Google AMP was just a way for Google to make money. The company claimed that the project was created to improve the mobile web and make it easier for people to phot editor access information while on the move. However many web developers and publishers saw this as Googles way of controlling the mobile web. By forcing publishers to create AMP versions of their pages Google was able to control the mobile web ecosystem and generate more revenue from advertising. While Google may have had good intentions with AMP the project was ultimately a way for the company to make more money. Please also check out my other fascinating article on Google Ads A Scary Future With High Prices Low Profits and More Competitors . Bad idea from the start Google AMP was a terrible idea from the start. The whole premise was to create a shortened version of the internet that would load faster on mobile devices. The problem was that a second internet was created that was incompatible with the regular internet.
It also put a lot of power in the hands of Google who could decide what content was and wasnt allowed on AMP. This made it difficult for publishers to reach their audience and many people simply abandoned AMP. Bad idea from the start Built to control the web The project was designed to address the shortcomings of the mobile web such as slow loading times and poor user experience. Google AMP was successful in achieving its goals but it also had several unintended consequences. One of them was that Google AMP pages were given advantage in Google search results. This created a situation where Google had significant control over the web. While Google AMP was a wellintentioned project its a good thing its no longer active. Google AMP was a bad idea Google AMP was a bad idea and its a good thing its gone. The idea was to create a shortened web version that would load faster on mobile devices. But it had several problems. First it created a separate version of the web that was incompatible with the regular web. Second it gave Google too much control over the mobile web.
Google AMP was just a way for Google to make money. The company claimed that the project was created to improve the mobile web and make it easier for people to phot editor access information while on the move. However many web developers and publishers saw this as Googles way of controlling the mobile web. By forcing publishers to create AMP versions of their pages Google was able to control the mobile web ecosystem and generate more revenue from advertising. While Google may have had good intentions with AMP the project was ultimately a way for the company to make more money. Please also check out my other fascinating article on Google Ads A Scary Future With High Prices Low Profits and More Competitors . Bad idea from the start Google AMP was a terrible idea from the start. The whole premise was to create a shortened version of the internet that would load faster on mobile devices. The problem was that a second internet was created that was incompatible with the regular internet.
It also put a lot of power in the hands of Google who could decide what content was and wasnt allowed on AMP. This made it difficult for publishers to reach their audience and many people simply abandoned AMP. Bad idea from the start Built to control the web The project was designed to address the shortcomings of the mobile web such as slow loading times and poor user experience. Google AMP was successful in achieving its goals but it also had several unintended consequences. One of them was that Google AMP pages were given advantage in Google search results. This created a situation where Google had significant control over the web. While Google AMP was a wellintentioned project its a good thing its no longer active. Google AMP was a bad idea Google AMP was a bad idea and its a good thing its gone. The idea was to create a shortened web version that would load faster on mobile devices. But it had several problems. First it created a separate version of the web that was incompatible with the regular web. Second it gave Google too much control over the mobile web.